|
The
ability of the Aulterra's Neutralizer to reverse
the harmful effects of electromagnetic fields
generated from cell phones on human DNA
THE ABILITY OF
THE AULTERRA’S NEUTRALIZER TO REVERSE THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC
FIELDS GENERATED FROM CELL PHONES ON HUMAN DNA
Maria Syldona, Ph.D.
Quantum Biology Research Labs
PO Box 157,
Northport, NY 11768
Summary
Electromagnetic (EM) fields from cell phones were shown
to have a statistically significant detrimental effect on the recovery
of human DNA after heat shock. This effect was observed with cell
phones on standby mode when they are emitting relatively weak EM fields
and after only minutes of EM field exposure. The detrimental effect
of EM energy from cell phones was completely neutralized when Aulterra's
Neutralizer was attached to the back of the cell phone. In the presence
of the Neutralizer there was 100% recovery of the DNA, as if no cell
phone was present. This neutralizing effect appears to prevent initial
damage to DNA immediately following EM field exposure.
The
Experimental Approach
In these experiments the biological system being influenced
by the EM fields from cell phones is purified human DNA suspended in
a natural ionic environment. Previous studies demonstrated that the
structure of DNA is sensitive to classical (Semin, 1995) and non-classical
(Rein, 1995) EM fields, thereby indicating that energy fields can influence
the winding and unwinding of the two strands which make up the DNA helix
and define its conformation.
Utilizing the well known fact that heat shock causes DNA
strands to unwind (Marmur, 1961), the Quantum Biology Research Lab developed
a sensitive assay which involves measuring the kinetics of rewinding
following heat shock. It is well known that as the DNA cools, it recovers
by rewinding back into an intact double helix (Marmur, 1961). The rewinding/
recovery process can be monitored by measuring the absorption of UV
light as a function of the cooling temperature or increasing time. As
the DNA recovers from the heat shock, hydrogen bonds reform to connect
the two strands. Thus healing or recovery of the DNA is directly related
to the number of hydrogen bonds. Preliminary experiments with the new
assay confirmed that weak EM fields slow down the rewinding or recovery
following heat shock.
More recently the DNA rewinding assay has been modified to increase
its sensitivity. The modifications are based on a previous study which
demonstrated that the sensitivity of DNA to UV light is enhanced in the
presence of small amounts of iron (ferric ions) (Audic, 1993). The modified
assay, which utilizes trace amounts of iron, has several advantages over
the original assay. Using the modified assay, weak EM field effects, reported
in this study, were observed within the first few minutes following EM
exposure and did not require conditioning (repeated exposure to EM fields).
Experimental
Methods
Three types of experiments were conducted in this study. The control
experiments were done first in the presence of ambient EM fields, but
in the absence of any man-made EM fields. In the electromagnetic experiments,
DNA recovery was measured in the presence of EM fields from cell phones.
The third set of experiments involved measuring DNA recovery in the
presence of neutralized EM fields from cell phones containing the Neutralizer.
The specific protocol that was followed involved making a stock solution
(0.4mg/ml) of human placental DNA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis) in
deionized water. The stock solution was diluted to 0.03mg/ml in 5mM
NaCl containing 1-4 µM FeCl and heat shocked (80°
C for 5 minutes). A concentration of 1 µM FeCl was shown to be optimal
and used in the final experiments. Immediately after heat treatment
the DNA was gently transferred to a quartz cuvette and then placed in
the cuvette holder inside the spectrophotometer. For EM field exposure
a mobile Nokia cell phone (plugged in and set on standby mode) was placed
face up on top of the cuvette. To neutralize the EM fields, the Neutralizer
was placed on the back of the cell phone directly below the antennae.
The cell phone containing the Neutralizer was then placed face up on
top of the cuvette. In these experiments normal and neutralized cell
phones were identically placed on the cuvette immediately after heat
treatment and remained there for the duration of the experiment. The
same protocol was used for these two sets of experiments, as well as
for controls, which were done in the absence of any cell phone treatment.
For all experiments, the conformation of DNA was measured with state-of-the
art biochemical methodology using a UV-visible diode array spectrophotometer
(Hewlett Packard 8451A) to quantify the amount of UV light absorbed
(Thomas, 1995). UV measurements began immediately
after the cell phones were placed on the cuvette. Absorption of UV light
at 260nm was measured every 60 seconds over the course of one hour following
heat shock. As the DNA recovers, it naturally rewinds and the absorption
of light gradually decreases. The slope of the rewinding
curve is a measure of DNA's ability to recover after heat shock. In
order to quantify the speed of recovery, the slopes were calculated
using IBM Excel software.
Results
For the data presented in Figure 1 only the initial portion
(the first five minutes) of the entire recovery curve was analyzed.
The slope in this region corresponds to the initial recovery rate, classically
used by biochemists in studying enzyme kinetics. The light grey irregular
line in this figure is a plot of the raw absorption data collected by
the spectrophotometer as a function of time after heat shock. The solid
black line is the computer generated best-fit calculation of the slope
(r2). The slope was calculated for each separate experiment
and then compared statistically using a two sample t-test (assuming
equal variance). For statistical analyses a total of 6 control experiments,
8 EM experiments and 6 neutralized EM experiments were used.
| |
Average
Slope
|
SD
|
n
|
p
(wrt control)
|
|
Control
|
0.877
|
0.041
|
6
|
|
|
Cell Phone
|
0.687
|
0.189
|
8
|
0.02
|
|
Cell Phone + Neutralizer
|
0.872
|
0.063
|
6
|
NS
|
A. Electromagnetic Fields from Cell Phones Effect DNA
Recovery
The results demonstrate the effect of electromagnetic
(EM) fields from
cell phones on DNA recovery after heat shock. In the absence of EM fields
(control experiments) a negative slope for DNA recovery is obtained.
A less negative value for the slope reflects a slower recovery following
heat shock. In the absence of EM fields the average slope (recovery)
was -0.877 ± 0.041. In the presence of EM fields from the cell phone
the slope had an average value of -0.687 ± 0.189. This indicates that
the EM field from the cell phone produced a 22% inhibition of recovery.
This detrimental effect of EM fields from the cell phone is highly significant
compared to the untreated control (p<0.02).
B. Cell Phone Damage Reversed with the Neutralizer
The cell phone containing the Neutralizer produced a similar effect
on DNA recovery as was observed in the controls. The average slope for
these experiments was - 0.872 ± 0.063. This result is not significantly
different than the control value indicating that the harmful effect
of the EM field from the cell phone is completely neutralized by the
presence of the Neutralizer.
Discussion
A previous study from the Quantum Biology Research Lab
(Syldona, 2000)
demonstrated an unusual effect when a test tube containing human DNA
in an aqueous solution was physically placed on top of the Aulterra
powder, the active ingredient of the Neutralizer. The results demonstrated
that the powder radiates an energy field which resonates with DNA producing
an oscillatory winding and unwinding behavior in its secondary structure.
Such behavior is consistent with the newly discovered phenomenon in
biological systems referred to as macroscopic quantum coherence (Chudnovsky,
2000) and suggests that the energy radiating from the Aulterra powder
is highly coherent (laser-like). Since the dielectric material in the
powder will radiate classic (incoherent) EM energy, it is conceivable
that the activation procedure in the manufacturing of the powder makes
this intrinsic energy coherent. Alternatively, the unique mixture of
minerals in the Aulterra powder may have intrinsic quantum properties,
like other complex lattice structures which also exhibits quantum properties
(Orrit, 1986).
The ability of Aulterra's powder to radiate quantum fields is related
to its ability to store quantum information following activation. Quantum
information storage is now a recognized technology in the computer industry
which involves optical and magneto-optical storage. Information storage
in computers and in Aulterra’s products share a common mechanism,
since they both require an external EM field to store the information
and both result in the emission of a different type of EM field. Some
variations of computer technology allow storage of information in three
dimensional lattice structures (Mok, 1991), similar to Aulterra's mineral
base. In other variations of computer technology, the emitted EM field
can be a coherent laser (Reif, 1991). Furthermore, certain storage media
exhibit unusual anomalous behavior referred to as space-inversion symmetry
(ie. normal symmetry associated with magnetization of the optical materials
is broken) (Pavlov, 1997). A similar situation also exists in phase
conjugating systems, where a time-reversed longitudinal wave is emitted
(Zozulya, 1994). According to quantum physics, both of these situations
occur at the quantum level and are associated with the presence of quantum
fields (Blumel, 1992). Therefore, if these established systems are capable
of emitting a quantum field, Aulterra's technology may also do the same.
If the Aulterra powder radiates a highly coherent field, how could
such a field neutralize the harmful, incoherent radiation emitted from
a cell phone? Although traditional physics theory states that two force
fields don’t interact in space (they just pass through each other),
recent experiments indicate that such interactions are possible. Working
with two incoherent light sources, Comorosan demonstrated that one could
modulate the action of the other to modulate a chemical reaction (Comorosan,
1990). In addition, Omura demonstrated that energy associated with a
chemical enzyme inhibitor, in powder form, could produce a biological
effect when the molecular energy was used to modulate a laser (Omura,
1994). In this sense the coherent laser energy acted as a carrier for
the molecular energy. These studies demonstrate that two energy fields
can in fact interact. Furthermore, mixing incoherent and coherent energies
can have differential effects on biological systems when the ratio of
incoherent to coherent energies is altered (Litovitz, 1994).
These studies offer an explanation for the ability of a coherent field
generated from the Aulterra powder to neutralize the biological effects
of incoherent energy from a cell phone. These studies also explain the
results in the previous study by the Quantum Biology Research Lab (Syldona,
2000). Coherent energy from the Aulterra powder could therefore neutralize
the detrimental biological effect of the molecular energy associated
with heavy metals. In these experiments, however, the biological system
(DNA) was being influenced by both the energy from the chemical toxin
and the chemical toxin itself. Nonethess, the Aulterra product offered
complete protection.
read
more about the cell phone Neutralizer
REFERENCES
Audic A, Giacomoni P (1993) DNA nicking by ultraviolet
radiation is enhanced in the presence of iron… Photochem &
Photobiol. 57: 508-512
Blumel R, Smilansky U (1992) Symmetry breaking and localization
in quantum chaotic systems. Phys Rev Lett. 69: 217-220
Chudnovsky EM, Friedman JR (2000). Macroscopic quantum
coherence in a magnetic nanoparticle above the surface of a superconductor
Phys Rev Lett. 85:5206-9.
Comorosan S. (1990) Modification of chemical reactivity
via a novel interaction of light and matter. J. Bio. Physics 17:
151-164.
Litovitz TA, Montrose CJ, Doinov P, et al (1994) Superimposing
spatially coherent electromagnetic noise inhibits field-induced abnormalities
in developing chick embryos.
Bioelectromagnetics. 15:105-13.
Marmur J, Doty P (1961) Thermal renaturation of DNA.
J. Mol. Biol. 3: 585-594.
Mok FH, Tackitt MC, Stoll, HM (1991) Storage of 500
high-resolution holograms in a LiNbO3 crystal. Optics Letters 16:
605-607.
Omura Y (1994) Transmission of molecular information
through electro-magnetic waves with different frequencies and its application
to non-invasive diagnosis of patients as well as detection from patient's
X-ray film of visible and not visible medical information.
Acupunct Electrother Res 19: 39-63.
Orrit M, Kottis P (1986) Quantum-mechanical-model calculations
of radiative properties of a molecular crystal. II. A transition to
coherence in the spontaneous emission from disordered two-dimensional
excitons. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 34:680-685
Pavlov VV, Pisarev RV, Kirilyuk A, Rasing T (1997) Observations
of a transverse nonlinear magneto-optical effect in thin magnetic garnet
films. Phys.Rev.Lett. 78: 2004-9
Reif J, Zink JC, Schneider CM, Kirschner J. (1991) Effects
of surface magnetism on optical second harmonic generation. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 67: 2878-2883
Rein, G. (1995) The in vitro effect of bioenergy on
the conformational states of human DNA in aqueous solutions. J. Acupunctrue
& Electrotherapeutics 20: 173-180.
Semin, IuA. (1995) Changes in secondary structure of
DNA under the influence of electromagnetic fields" Radiat Biol
Radioecology 35: 36-41.
Syldona, M. (2000) Conformational changes in human DNA
characterize the radiated energy from the Aulterra formulation. Quantum
Biology Research Lab, private report.
Thomas R. (1995) Properties of aqueous solutions of
DNA" Biochem. Biophysica Acta 14: 231-238.
Zozulya AA, Saffman M, Anderson (1994) DZ Propagation
of light beams in photorefractive media: Fanning, self-bending, and
formation of self-pumped four-wave-mixing phase conjugation geometries.
Phys Rev Lett. 73: 818-821.
|
